0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.75%
Positive operating income growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.47%
Positive net income growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.63%
Positive EPS growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
4.63%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.54%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0464.HK's 43.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
57.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 7.94%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
59.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1210.34%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1210.34%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1077.47%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
138.06%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
138.06%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
77.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0464.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
42.68%
We show growth while 0464.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
35.24%
Positive asset growth while 0464.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.05%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 1.73%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
9.48%
We have some new debt while 0464.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.