PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
45.70%
Revenue growth of 45.70% while 0464.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
2.76%
Gross profit growth of 2.76% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-15.72%
Negative EBIT growth while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-16.63%
Negative operating income growth while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-42.49%
Negative net income growth while 0464.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-44.22%
Negative EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-44.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-217.16%
Negative OCF growth while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-226.66%
Negative FCF growth while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
14.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0464.HK's 43.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
14.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 7.94%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
16.42%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-867.61%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-867.61%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-472.61%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-31.54%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-31.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-48.96%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.78%
Inventory growth well above 0464.HK's 12.05%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-9.23%
Negative asset growth while 0464.HK invests at 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.63%
We have a declining book value while 0464.HK shows 1.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
7.68%
We have some new debt while 0464.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.84%
SG&A growth of 12.84% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.