0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.55%
Negative revenue growth while 0464.HK stands at 5.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.22%
Negative gross profit growth while 0464.HK is at 480.14%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-100.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 0464.HK is at 109.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.26%
Negative operating income growth while 0464.HK is at 109.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.60%
Negative net income growth while 0464.HK stands at 120.04%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-37.55%
Negative EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 120.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.55%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 120.05%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0464.HK's 0.01%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.22%
Negative OCF growth while 0464.HK is at 87.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.75%
Negative FCF growth while 0464.HK is at 192.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-3.80%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 40.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-2.42%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
22.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
203.81%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
326.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-53.63%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-48.49%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-61.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-56.09%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 6.72%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-21.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0464.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-26.73%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-11.35%
Negative asset growth while 0464.HK invests at 1.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.36%
Under 50% of 0464.HK's 1.71%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
15.30%
Debt growth far above 0464.HK's 6.76%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.60%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.