PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.22%
Positive revenue growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.63%
Positive gross profit growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
23.57%
Positive net income growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.48%
Positive EPS growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0464.HK's 0.00%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0464.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
78.89%
OCF growth under 50% of 0464.HK's 180.18%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
83.21%
FCF growth under 50% of 0464.HK's 340.51%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
106.29%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
4.63%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.94%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
987.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
505.43%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-17.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 70.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
27.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-52.65%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-46.52%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.39%
Below 50% of 0464.HK's 30.95%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
15.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 5.80%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
Our AR growth while 0464.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-24.05%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.85%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.70%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 0.85%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-17.96%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.16%
SG&A growth well above 0464.HK's 1.77%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.