PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-34.77%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-21.03%
Negative gross profit growth while 0464.HK is at 2.08%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.81%
Negative operating income growth while 0464.HK is at 39.05%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
16.51%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 9.89%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
16.56%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x 0464.HK's 11.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
16.56%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x 0464.HK's 11.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 0464.HK is at 1.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.43%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-22.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-32.72%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-13.73%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-41.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
332.45%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
15.73%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
156.34%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-25.84%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-34.73%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
8.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 18.93%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.50%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 0.25%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.66%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-21.05%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0464.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
17.16%
We show growth while 0464.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-21.04%
Negative asset growth while 0464.HK invests at 0.96%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.20%
Positive BV/share change while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-38.98%
We’re deleveraging while 0464.HK stands at 23.38%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.61%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.