Futong Technology Development Holdings Limited (0465.HK)

Positive revenue growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Slight or no buybacks while 0464.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive OCF growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 6.34%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 149.11%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

Positive OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 1.80%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

Positive short-term equity growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

Firm’s AR is declining while 0464.HK shows 11.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

We show growth while 0464.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

Positive asset growth while 0464.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We have some new debt while 0464.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We expand SG&A while 0464.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.