PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.85%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 7.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-13.84%
Negative gross profit growth while 0464.HK is at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.70%
Negative operating income growth while 0464.HK is at 53.20%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-108.82%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-109.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-109.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-7.24%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-7.18%
Reduced diluted shares while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-97.47%
Dividend reduction while 0464.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
79.71%
Positive OCF growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
78.76%
Positive FCF growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
150.56%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
59.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-9.55%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-484.78%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-129.36%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-156.22%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-111.91%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-105.00%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-107.21%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK is 46.79%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.20%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.06%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.50%
We show growth while 0464.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
27.12%
Positive asset growth while 0464.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.42%
Positive BV/share change while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
55.15%
Debt growth far above 0464.HK's 4.07%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.41%
We expand SG&A while 0464.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.