PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.81%
Positive revenue growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-11.22%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-6681.17%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-6600.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-6600.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.11%
Slight or no buybacks while 0464.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.11%
Diluted share change of 2.11% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
274.27%
Positive OCF growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
269.63%
Positive FCF growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
133.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-1.61%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
13.41%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
3556.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
338.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
236.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-368.92%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-290.75%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-311.24%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.17%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.71%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0464.HK shows 12.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-11.06%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-17.72%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.94%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-31.50%
We’re deleveraging while 0464.HK stands at 8.64%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.96%
We expand SG&A while 0464.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.