PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-40.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
4.11%
Positive gross profit growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
331.61%
Positive operating income growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
122.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 21.77%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
123.08%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 21.77%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
123.08%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 21.77%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-1.87%
Share reduction while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.87%
Reduced diluted shares while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.62%
Negative OCF growth while 0464.HK is at 137.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-52.45%
Negative FCF growth while 0464.HK is at 110.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-28.92%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-28.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
5.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
782.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
157.26%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0464.HK's 253.81%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
104.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0464.HK's 92.83%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
-68.71%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-46.68%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-57.80%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.34%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.80%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0464.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-37.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-50.48%
Inventory is declining while 0464.HK stands at 39.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-41.20%
Negative asset growth while 0464.HK invests at 4.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.14%
Positive BV/share change while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-70.86%
We’re deleveraging while 0464.HK stands at 29.97%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0464.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-33.26%
We cut SG&A while 0464.HK invests at 6.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.