PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.92%
Negative revenue growth while 0464.HK stands at 18.28%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-32.44%
Negative gross profit growth while 0464.HK is at 183.92%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.12%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x 0464.HK's 27.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
9.82%
Positive net income growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
8.00%
Positive EPS growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.70%
Slight or no buybacks while 0464.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.70%
Diluted share change of 1.70% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.28%
Positive OCF growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
99.97%
Positive FCF growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-11.98%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-68.68%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-55.35%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2680.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
405.48%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
49.13%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-49.61%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-59.07%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0464.HK is 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
552.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.84%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0464.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-42.29%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0464.HK shows 22.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-58.41%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-8.31%
Negative asset growth while 0464.HK invests at 2.70%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.18%
Positive BV/share change while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-78.21%
We’re deleveraging while 0464.HK stands at 55.70%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.73%
We cut SG&A while 0464.HK invests at 5.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.