PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.39%
Negative revenue growth while 0464.HK stands at 10.54%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.05%
Negative gross profit growth while 0464.HK is at 27.88%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.95%
Negative operating income growth while 0464.HK is at 35.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-11.57%
Negative net income growth while 0464.HK stands at 63.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.80%
Negative EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 63.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.80%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 63.83%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.83%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.83%
Reduced diluted shares while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.46%
Negative OCF growth while 0464.HK is at 59.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-125.55%
Negative FCF growth while 0464.HK is at 55.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-64.23%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-63.34%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-63.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-231.27%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-246.17%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
49.50%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-77.53%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-41.50%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-51.85%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.52%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-1.93%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.20%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-15.61%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0464.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
2.61%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 0464.HK's 26.25%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-13.49%
Inventory is declining while 0464.HK stands at 5.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-11.95%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.49%
Positive BV/share change while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-60.19%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0464.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-18.87%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.