PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.40%
Positive revenue growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-10.09%
Negative gross profit growth while 0464.HK is at 159.55%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.46%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x 0464.HK's 102.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
151.67%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 92.63%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
151.78%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 92.70%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
151.78%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 92.70%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.01%
Share change of 0.01% while 0464.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.14%
Negative OCF growth while 0464.HK is at 155.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-86.89%
Negative FCF growth while 0464.HK is at 134.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-67.50%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-62.33%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-78.61%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-77.79%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-80.81%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
107.75%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-90.66%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-85.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0464.HK is 60.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
408.55%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 78.08%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
35.33%
Positive growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-3.60%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-5.94%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
7.33%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 0464.HK's 55.91%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-41.82%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0464.HK's 6.78%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.62%
Under 50% of 0464.HK's 4.53%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-65.57%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0464.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-26.11%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.