PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-43.71%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.71%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.48%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-106.29%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-105.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-105.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while 0464.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
325.75%
OCF growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 7.00%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
335.95%
FCF growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 17.16%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-81.71%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-85.33%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-87.81%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
7.81%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-69.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is at 178.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-80.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 116.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-100.58%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-112.88%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
99.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 23.83%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
25.56%
Positive growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-3.89%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
3.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
49.39%
We show growth while 0464.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.11%
Positive asset growth while 0464.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.07%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
8.77%
We have some new debt while 0464.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.31%
SG&A growth well above 0464.HK's 12.66%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.