PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-36.84%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-31.68%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-131.12%
Negative net income growth while 0464.HK stands at 112.27%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-126.95%
Negative EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 112.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-126.95%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 112.29%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.94%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-87.48%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-92.57%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-95.33%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-86.51%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-145.63%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-55.38%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-117.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 15.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-242.86%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-2756.04%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0464.HK is 108.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-603.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK is 105.10%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-1.32%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-21.18%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-12.28%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.54%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
407.97%
Inventory growth well above 0464.HK's 2.06%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.75%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-31.66%
We’re deleveraging while 0464.HK stands at 19.27%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.94%
We expand SG&A while 0464.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.