PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-42.78%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
77.20%
Positive gross profit growth while 0464.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-25.15%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 0464.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.88%
OCF growth under 50% of 0464.HK's 738.03%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
123.76%
FCF growth under 50% of 0464.HK's 1999.71%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-93.25%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-93.14%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-58.39%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
120.58%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0464.HK's 66.13%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-91.36%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is at 133.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-73.60%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK stands at 220.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-299.67%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-4.68%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0464.HK is 13.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-585.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK is 12.07%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-20.51%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-24.42%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-26.46%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.78%
Our AR growth while 0464.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-90.78%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-9.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.37%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
129.55%
We have some new debt while 0464.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.40%
We expand SG&A while 0464.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.