PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
169.78%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0464.HK's 57.83%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
155.92%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of 0464.HK's 227.95%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.38%
Negative operating income growth while 0464.HK is at 148.78%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-22.27%
Negative net income growth while 0464.HK stands at 13.95%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 17.74%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0464.HK is at 17.74%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0464.HK's 4.78%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.29%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-151.12%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-95.07%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-84.27%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-52.13%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-134.80%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-106.88%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0464.HK is at 61.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-133.72%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-286.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0464.HK is at 79.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-554.45%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0464.HK is 78.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-22938.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0464.HK is 69.46%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-40.61%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-41.53%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-42.11%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0464.HK shows 18.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-13.28%
Negative asset growth while 0464.HK invests at 54.70%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-12.51%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
34.59%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 0464.HK's 179.91%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
117.33%
R&D growth of 117.33% while 0464.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
13.96%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0464.HK's 45.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.