PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.72%
Positive revenue growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-76.02%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-56.61%
Negative EBIT growth while 0472.HK is at 136.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-38.79%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-32.52%
Negative EPS growth while 0472.HK is at 104.32%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.52%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0472.HK is at 104.32%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while 0472.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar OCF growth to 0472.HK's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
100.00%
FCF growth similar to 0472.HK's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-94.79%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-72.16%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 130.79%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-8.24%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-312.21%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0472.HK is at 64.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-557.81%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
20.57%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-55.77%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0472.HK stands at 86.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-54.84%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-48.30%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.48%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.61%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-13.92%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-34.53%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
97.32%
R&D growth of 97.32% while 0472.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
3.37%
We expand SG&A while 0472.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.