PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% while 0472.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while 0472.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-0.16%
Negative operating income growth while 0472.HK is at 25.66%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.23%
Positive net income growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.18%
Positive EPS growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0472.HK's 31.38%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
97.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0472.HK's 152.61%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
97.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0472.HK's 63.64%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-368.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 103.70%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-368.11%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-368.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 104.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
168.86%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0472.HK's 152.77%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
168.86%
Below 50% of 0472.HK's 3233.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
168.86%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A growth of 0.00% while 0472.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.