PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.51%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.00%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-31.58%
Negative EBIT growth while 0472.HK is at 2.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-25.81%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-16.73%
Negative net income growth while 0472.HK stands at 713.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-16.72%
Negative EPS growth while 0472.HK is at 718.18%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-16.72%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0472.HK is at 718.18%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0472.HK's 0.01%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.69%
Dividend reduction while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-100.83%
Negative OCF growth while 0472.HK is at 255.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-98.73%
Negative FCF growth while 0472.HK is at 34.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-0.74%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 191.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-0.74%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 19.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
27.28%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-1641.60%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 175.62%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1641.60%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-512.57%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-41.30%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0472.HK is at 110.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-41.30%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-48.34%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.67%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0472.HK's 21.30%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6193.74%
AR growth of 6193.74% while 0472.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
28.40%
We show growth while 0472.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-4.51%
Negative asset growth while 0472.HK invests at 0.86%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.85%
Under 50% of 0472.HK's 3.06%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
6.85%
Debt growth far above 0472.HK's 1.40%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.