PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-17.22%
Negative gross profit growth while 0472.HK is at 158.21%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-100.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 0472.HK is at 110.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.26%
Negative operating income growth while 0472.HK is at 110.57%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.60%
Negative net income growth while 0472.HK stands at 100.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-37.55%
Negative EPS growth while 0472.HK is at 100.18%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.55%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0472.HK is at 100.18%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0472.HK's 0.23%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.22%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-11.75%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-3.80%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 49.76%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-2.42%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
22.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
203.81%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
326.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-53.63%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-48.49%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-61.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-56.09%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.84%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-21.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0472.HK shows 60.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-26.73%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-11.35%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.36%
Positive BV/share change while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
15.30%
We have some new debt while 0472.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.60%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.