PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.22%
Positive revenue growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.63%
Positive gross profit growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
23.57%
Positive net income growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.48%
Positive EPS growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 0472.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
78.89%
OCF growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 186.88%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
83.21%
FCF growth 50-75% of 0472.HK's 159.68%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
106.29%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to 0472.HK's 96.69%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
4.63%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.94%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
987.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0472.HK's 737.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
505.43%
Below 50% of 0472.HK's 12574.49%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-17.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 521.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
27.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-52.65%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-46.52%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.39%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0472.HK's 1.64%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
15.35%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
Our AR growth while 0472.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-24.05%
Inventory is declining while 0472.HK stands at 6.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.85%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.70%
Positive BV/share change while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-17.96%
We’re deleveraging while 0472.HK stands at 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.16%
SG&A growth well above 0472.HK's 30.23%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.