PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-34.77%
Negative revenue growth while 0472.HK stands at 26.89%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-21.03%
Negative gross profit growth while 0472.HK is at 108.65%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.81%
Negative operating income growth while 0472.HK is at 71.93%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
16.51%
Net income growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 92.14%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
16.56%
EPS growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 92.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
16.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 92.42%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 0472.HK is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.43%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-22.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-32.72%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 24.78%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-13.73%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-41.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
332.45%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
15.73%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
156.34%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-25.84%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-34.73%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
8.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.38%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
19.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.66%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0472.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-21.05%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
17.16%
We show growth while 0472.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-21.04%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.20%
Positive BV/share change while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-38.98%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.61%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.