PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.45%
Positive revenue growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-4.36%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.34%
Negative operating income growth while 0472.HK is at 26.65%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-93.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-92.97%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-92.97%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0472.HK's 30.00%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.87%
Dividend reduction while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
168.26%
Positive OCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
178.21%
Positive FCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
94.34%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-18.27%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2219.76%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
254.07%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
251.10%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-89.65%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-95.51%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-92.66%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.64%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.11%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.57%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0472.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-10.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0472.HK shows 139.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
13.59%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0472.HK's 122.91%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
10.10%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0472.HK's 203.73%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.18%
Under 50% of 0472.HK's 94.43%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
1.47%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 0472.HK's 849.08%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.99%
We expand SG&A while 0472.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.