PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.85%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 40.32%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-13.84%
Negative gross profit growth while 0472.HK is at 47.15%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.70%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-108.82%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-109.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-109.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-7.24%
Share reduction while 0472.HK is at 10.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.18%
Reduced diluted shares while 0472.HK is at 10.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-97.47%
Dividend reduction while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
79.71%
Positive OCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
78.76%
Positive FCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
150.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0472.HK's 36.81%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
59.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-9.55%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-484.78%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-129.36%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-156.22%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-111.91%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-105.00%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-107.21%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is 44.40%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.20%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.06%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.50%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0472.HK's 453.81%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
27.12%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0472.HK's 132.50%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
7.42%
Positive BV/share change while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
55.15%
We have some new debt while 0472.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.41%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0472.HK's 128.64%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.