PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.76%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
2.97%
Positive gross profit growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.06%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0472.HK's 46.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
136.02%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0472.HK's 63.11%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
135.09%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0472.HK's 71.38%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
135.09%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0472.HK's 71.38%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.81%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0472.HK's 28.70%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
2.75%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0472.HK's 28.69%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
2829.79%
Dividend growth of 2829.79% while 0472.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-472.46%
Negative OCF growth while 0472.HK is at 82.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-449.59%
Negative FCF growth while 0472.HK is at 84.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
18.49%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
3.24%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
23.17%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-1171.24%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-39.56%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-452.60%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-97.91%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-96.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-95.95%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.47%
Below 50% of 0472.HK's 73.33%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
8.51%
Below 50% of 0472.HK's 95.34%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.69%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-57.17%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0472.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
0.99%
Our AR growth while 0472.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-19.74%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-7.06%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.52%
We have a declining book value while 0472.HK shows 122.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
17.00%
We have some new debt while 0472.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-16.72%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.