0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.81%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 26.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-11.22%
Negative gross profit growth while 0472.HK is at 4.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-6681.17%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-6600.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-6600.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.11%
Share count expansion well above 0472.HK's 1.46%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.11%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0472.HK's 1.47%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
274.27%
Positive OCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
269.63%
Positive FCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
133.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-1.61%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
13.41%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
3556.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
338.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
236.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-368.92%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-290.75%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-311.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is 88.47%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.17%
Below 50% of 0472.HK's 51.72%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-4.71%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0472.HK is at 155.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0472.HK shows 32.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-11.06%
Inventory is declining while 0472.HK stands at 188.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-17.72%
Negative asset growth while 0472.HK invests at 30.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-8.94%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-31.50%
We’re deleveraging while 0472.HK stands at 418.27%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.96%
SG&A growth well above 0472.HK's 8.70%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.