PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-40.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
4.11%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 15.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
331.61%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0472.HK's 60.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
122.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0472.HK's 65.83%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
123.08%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0472.HK's 65.41%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
123.08%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0472.HK's 65.41%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-1.87%
Share reduction while 0472.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.87%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.62%
Negative OCF growth while 0472.HK is at 42.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-52.45%
Negative FCF growth while 0472.HK is at 48.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-28.92%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-28.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
5.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
782.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
157.26%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
104.13%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-68.71%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-46.68%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-57.80%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is 49.92%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.34%
Below 50% of 0472.HK's 43.09%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-4.80%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0472.HK is at 158.02%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0472.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-37.69%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0472.HK shows 374.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-50.48%
Inventory is declining while 0472.HK stands at 5.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-41.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.14%
Positive BV/share change while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-70.86%
We’re deleveraging while 0472.HK stands at 7.03%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-33.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.