PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-45.31%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-27.69%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-176.24%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-168.14%
Negative net income growth while 0472.HK stands at 75.76%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-168.17%
Negative EPS growth while 0472.HK is at 67.52%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-168.17%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0472.HK is at 67.52%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
234.80%
Positive OCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
234.11%
Positive FCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-80.43%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-81.30%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-84.60%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
546.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
10.14%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
411.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0472.HK's 83.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-115.27%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-132.26%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0472.HK is 93.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-244.87%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is 75.59%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
9.09%
Below 50% of 0472.HK's 128.45%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-2.06%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0472.HK is at 124.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-9.76%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0472.HK is at 200.98%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0472.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-46.13%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-59.01%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-7.50%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.06%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-5.22%
We’re deleveraging while 0472.HK stands at 5.61%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
We expand SG&A while 0472.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.