PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-43.71%
Negative revenue growth while 0472.HK stands at 37.13%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.71%
Negative gross profit growth while 0472.HK is at 1325.77%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.48%
Negative operating income growth while 0472.HK is at 13.66%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-106.29%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-105.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-105.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Share count expansion well above 0472.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
325.75%
Positive OCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
335.95%
Positive FCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-81.71%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-85.33%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-87.81%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
7.81%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-69.55%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-80.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 27.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-100.58%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-112.88%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
99.50%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
25.56%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0472.HK's 46.16%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-3.89%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0472.HK is at 53.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
3.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
49.39%
Inventory growth well above 0472.HK's 30.31%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.11%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0472.HK's 17.40%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.07%
We have a declining book value while 0472.HK shows 4.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.77%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 0472.HK's 31.81%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.31%
SG&A growth well above 0472.HK's 26.90%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.