PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-36.84%
Negative revenue growth while 0472.HK stands at 5001.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-31.68%
Negative gross profit growth while 0472.HK is at 2025.30%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.33%
Negative operating income growth while 0472.HK is at 2120.63%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-131.12%
Negative net income growth while 0472.HK stands at 724.58%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-126.95%
Negative EPS growth while 0472.HK is at 721.62%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-126.95%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0472.HK is at 721.62%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 0472.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.94%
Negative OCF growth while 0472.HK is at 879.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-87.48%
Negative FCF growth while 0472.HK is at 877.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-92.57%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 563.23%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-95.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 1122.95%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-86.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-145.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 11452.91%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-55.38%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK is at 290.90%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-117.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-242.86%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0472.HK is at 129.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-2756.04%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0472.HK is 173.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-603.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-1.32%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0472.HK stands at 46.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-21.18%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0472.HK is at 218.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-12.28%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0472.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.54%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0472.HK shows 123.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
407.97%
We show growth while 0472.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-3.75%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.52%
We have a declining book value while 0472.HK shows 2.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-31.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.94%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0472.HK's 199.66%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.