PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-68.47%
Negative revenue growth while 0472.HK stands at 13.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-65.37%
Negative gross profit growth while 0472.HK is at 21.04%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.14%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 59.01%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.76%
Net income growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 68.86%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
7.69%
EPS growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 68.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.69%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0472.HK's 68.85%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.88%
Positive OCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
49.71%
Positive FCF growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-97.45%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-96.44%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-90.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 172.84%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
115.36%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0472.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-73.17%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK is at 93.29%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
185.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0472.HK's 90.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-313.99%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-501.36%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0472.HK is 16.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1283.84%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK is 71.96%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-28.65%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0472.HK stands at 11.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-32.91%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-33.75%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0472.HK shows 2774.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-53.13%
Inventory is declining while 0472.HK stands at 113.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-11.37%
Negative asset growth while 0472.HK invests at 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-9.24%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-20.58%
We’re deleveraging while 0472.HK stands at 85.78%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-67.07%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-20.36%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.