PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
169.78%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 0472.HK's 146.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
155.92%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 0472.HK's 70.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.38%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-22.27%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-25.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-25.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.00%
Share count expansion well above 0472.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.29%
Negative OCF growth while 0472.HK is at 275.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-151.12%
Negative FCF growth while 0472.HK is at 274.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-95.07%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-84.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-52.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 391.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-134.80%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-106.88%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-133.72%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0472.HK stands at 109.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-286.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0472.HK is at 60.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-554.45%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0472.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-22938.97%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-40.61%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0472.HK stands at 25.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-41.53%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0472.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-42.11%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0472.HK shows 36.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-13.28%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-12.51%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
34.59%
We have some new debt while 0472.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
117.33%
R&D growth of 117.33% while 0472.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
13.96%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0472.HK's 45.11%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.