0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-49.38%
Negative revenue growth while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-41.91%
Negative gross profit growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-44.61%
Negative EBIT growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-44.57%
Negative operating income growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-31.13%
Negative net income growth while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.88%
Negative EPS growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.88%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.69%
Share change of 2.69% while 8198.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
2.69%
Diluted share change of 2.69% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.83%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-181.77%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-1.42%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-1.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-1.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-234.05%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-234.05%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-234.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
34.13%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 34.13% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
34.13%
Net income/share CAGR of 34.13% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
34.13%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 34.13% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.83%
We cut SG&A while 8198.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.