PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% while 8198.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-0.16%
Negative operating income growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.23%
Net income growth of 0.23% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
2.18%
EPS growth of 2.18% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
2.18%
Diluted EPS growth of 2.18% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.16%
10Y CAGR of 97.16% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
97.16%
5Y CAGR of 97.16% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
97.16%
3Y CAGR of 97.16% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
-368.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-368.11%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-368.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
168.86%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 168.86% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
168.86%
Net income/share CAGR of 168.86% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
168.86%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 168.86% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A growth of 0.00% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.