0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.75%
Positive operating income growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.47%
Positive net income growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.63%
Positive EPS growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
4.63%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.54%
10Y CAGR of 57.54% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
57.54%
5Y CAGR of 57.54% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
59.81%
3Y CAGR of 59.81% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1210.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 1210.34% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
1210.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 1210.34% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
1077.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 1077.47% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
138.06%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 138.06% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
138.06%
Net income/share CAGR of 138.06% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
77.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 77.49% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 8198.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
42.68%
Inventory growth of 42.68% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
35.24%
Asset growth of 35.24% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
10.05%
BV/share growth of 10.05% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
9.48%
Debt growth of 9.48% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.