PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
45.70%
Positive revenue growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.76%
Positive gross profit growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-15.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-16.63%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-42.49%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-44.22%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-44.22%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-217.16%
Negative OCF growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-226.66%
Negative FCF growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
14.77%
10Y CAGR of 14.77% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
14.77%
5Y CAGR of 14.77% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
16.42%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-867.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-867.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-472.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 73.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-31.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-31.54%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-48.96%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.78%
Inventory growth of 33.78% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-9.23%
Negative asset growth while 8198.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.63%
We have a declining book value while 8198.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
7.68%
Debt growth of 7.68% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.84%
SG&A growth of 12.84% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.