0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.59%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 233.46%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
10.77%
Positive gross profit growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
11.19%
EBIT growth below 50% of 8198.HK's 38534.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.99%
Operating income growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 5920.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.96%
Net income growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 813.18%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.05%
EPS growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 290.32%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.05%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 290.32%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Dividend reduction while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.77%
10Y CAGR of 137.77% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
137.77%
5Y CAGR of 137.77% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
20.60%
3Y CAGR of 20.60% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
-1635.22%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1635.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-472.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
40.98%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 40.98% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
40.98%
Net income/share CAGR of 40.98% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-47.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8198.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 0.92% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.90%
Inventory is declining while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
22.86%
Asset growth of 22.86% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
5.75%
BV/share growth of 5.75% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
55.56%
Debt growth of 55.56% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.81%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 8198.HK's 3859.63%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.