PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.55%
Negative revenue growth while 8198.HK stands at 2.90%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.22%
Negative gross profit growth while 8198.HK is at 2.11%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-100.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 8198.HK is at 30.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.26%
Negative operating income growth while 8198.HK is at 30.32%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.60%
Negative net income growth while 8198.HK stands at 28.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-37.55%
Negative EPS growth while 8198.HK is at 34.34%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.55%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8198.HK is at 34.34%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 8198.HK's 8.32%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.22%
Negative OCF growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.75%
Negative FCF growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-3.80%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-2.42%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
22.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
203.81%
OCF/share CAGR of 203.81% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
326.63%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 8198.HK's 101.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-53.63%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 105.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-48.49%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-61.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is 91.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-56.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8198.HK is 92.67%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.84%
Below 50% of 8198.HK's 128.95%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 8198.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-21.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while 8198.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-26.73%
Inventory is declining while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-11.35%
Negative asset growth while 8198.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.36%
BV/share growth of 0.36% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
15.30%
Debt growth of 15.30% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.60%
We cut SG&A while 8198.HK invests at 12.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.