PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.22%
Positive revenue growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.63%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 8198.HK's 1.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.96%
Negative operating income growth while 8198.HK is at 76.21%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
23.57%
Net income growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 79.63%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
23.48%
EPS growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 79.83%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.48%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 79.92%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 8198.HK's 0.08%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
78.89%
Positive OCF growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
83.21%
Positive FCF growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
106.29%
10Y CAGR of 106.29% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
4.63%
5Y CAGR of 4.63% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
30.94%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
987.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 987.00% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
505.43%
OCF/share CAGR of 505.43% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-17.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 76.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
27.31%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 27.31% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-52.65%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-46.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8198.HK is 98.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.39%
Equity/share CAGR of 11.39% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
15.35%
Below 50% of 8198.HK's 117.99%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
AR growth of 10.16% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-24.05%
Inventory is declining while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.85%
Negative asset growth while 8198.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.70%
BV/share growth of 3.70% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-17.96%
We’re deleveraging while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.16%
We expand SG&A while 8198.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.