PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.45%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 134.01%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-4.36%
Negative gross profit growth while 8198.HK is at 91.75%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-93.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-92.97%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-92.97%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Slight or no buybacks while 8198.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.87%
Dividend reduction while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
168.26%
OCF growth above 1.5x 8198.HK's 88.77%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
178.21%
FCF growth above 1.5x 8198.HK's 88.28%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
94.34%
10Y CAGR of 94.34% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
24.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-18.27%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2219.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 2219.76% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
254.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 8198.HK's 97.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
251.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 8198.HK's 85.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-89.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.51%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is 95.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-92.66%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.64%
Below 50% of 8198.HK's 128.36%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
13.11%
Below 50% of 8198.HK's 272.37%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.57%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 8198.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-10.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while 8198.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
13.59%
Inventory growth of 13.59% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
10.10%
Asset growth of 10.10% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
0.18%
BV/share growth of 0.18% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
1.47%
Debt growth of 1.47% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.99%
SG&A growth well above 8198.HK's 12.99%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.