PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.52%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 95.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
16.18%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 44.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.72%
Positive operating income growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1154.17%
Positive net income growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1100.00%
Positive EPS growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.74%
Slight or no buybacks while 8198.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.76%
Slight or no buyback while 8198.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
2215.96%
Dividend growth of 2215.96% while 8198.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-178.65%
Negative OCF growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-180.23%
Negative FCF growth while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-3.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
23.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-2.31%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-979.39%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-234.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 97.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
42.96%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 8198.HK's 88.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-37.41%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-46.65%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is 94.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
6.63%
Positive short-term CAGR while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.42%
Below 50% of 8198.HK's 124.11%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.30%
Below 50% of 8198.HK's 232.50%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.73%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-43.17%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 8198.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 8198.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.99%
Inventory is declining while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-4.21%
Negative asset growth while 8198.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.59%
We have a declining book value while 8198.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-16.02%
We’re deleveraging while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 8198.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-14.33%
We cut SG&A while 8198.HK invests at 10.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.