PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.85%
Positive revenue growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-13.84%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.70%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-108.82%
Negative net income growth while 8198.HK stands at 432.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-109.50%
Negative EPS growth while 8198.HK is at 431.85%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-109.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8198.HK is at 431.85%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-7.24%
Share reduction while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.18%
Reduced diluted shares while 8198.HK is at 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-97.47%
Dividend reduction while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
79.71%
OCF growth of 79.71% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
78.76%
FCF growth of 78.76% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
150.56%
10Y CAGR of 150.56% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
59.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-9.55%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-484.78%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-129.36%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 41.70%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-156.22%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-111.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-105.00%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is 103.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-107.21%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8198.HK is 1270.69%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.20%
Below 50% of 8198.HK's 117.51%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
13.06%
Below 50% of 8198.HK's 292.81%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.50%
Inventory growth of 26.50% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
27.12%
Asset growth of 27.12% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
7.42%
BV/share growth of 7.42% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
55.15%
Debt growth of 55.15% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.41%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 8198.HK's 382.28%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.