PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.81%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8198.HK's 211.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-11.22%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-6681.17%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-6600.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-6600.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.11%
Share count expansion well above 8198.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.11%
Diluted share count expanding well above 8198.HK's 0.41%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
274.27%
OCF growth of 274.27% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
269.63%
FCF growth of 269.63% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
133.95%
10Y CAGR of 133.95% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-1.61%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
13.41%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 8198.HK's 169.05%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
3556.46%
OCF/share CAGR of 3556.46% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
338.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
236.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-368.92%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-290.75%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-311.24%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.17%
Below 50% of 8198.HK's 267.47%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-4.71%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while 8198.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-11.06%
Inventory is declining while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-17.72%
Negative asset growth while 8198.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-8.94%
We have a declining book value while 8198.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-31.50%
We’re deleveraging while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.96%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 8198.HK's 268.74%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.