PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-43.71%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.71%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.48%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-106.29%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-105.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-105.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while 8198.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
325.75%
OCF growth of 325.75% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
335.95%
FCF growth of 335.95% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-81.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 57.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-85.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 331.18%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-87.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 241.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
7.81%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 8198.HK's 34.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-69.55%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-80.68%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-100.58%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8198.HK is at 94.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-112.88%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
99.50%
Positive short-term CAGR while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
25.56%
Below 50% of 8198.HK's 122.51%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-3.89%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
3.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while 8198.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 8198.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while 8198.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
49.39%
Inventory growth of 49.39% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.11%
Asset growth of 1.11% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-0.07%
We have a declining book value while 8198.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.77%
Debt growth of 8.77% while 8198.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.31%
We expand SG&A while 8198.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.