PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-49.38%
Negative revenue growth while 9698.HK stands at 6.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-41.91%
Negative gross profit growth while 9698.HK is at 6.84%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-44.61%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-44.57%
Negative operating income growth while 9698.HK is at 13.51%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-31.13%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-32.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-32.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.69%
Slight or no buybacks while 9698.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.69%
Slight or no buyback while 9698.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.83%
Negative OCF growth while 9698.HK is at 10.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-181.77%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-1.42%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-1.42%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-1.42%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-234.05%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-234.05%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-234.05%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
34.13%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
34.13%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
34.13%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.83%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.