PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
100.00%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
100.00%
Positive EBIT growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
100.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 13.51%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
100.00%
Positive net income growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 9698.HK is at 10.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-1.42%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-1.42%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-1.42%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-234.05%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-234.05%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-234.05%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
34.13%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
34.13%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
34.13%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while 9698.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.