PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 9698.HK's 6.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 9698.HK's 6.84%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.16%
Positive EBIT growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-2.00%
Negative operating income growth while 9698.HK is at 13.51%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.42%
Positive net income growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.83%
Positive EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.83%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.33%
Negative OCF growth while 9698.HK is at 10.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.95%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
55.97%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
55.97%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
55.97%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
555.17%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 9698.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
555.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
555.17%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
130.48%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
130.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
130.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-50.69%
Inventory is declining while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.63%
Negative asset growth while 9698.HK invests at 7.82%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
9.95%
Positive BV/share change while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
21.88%
Debt growth far above 9698.HK's 8.93%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
We expand SG&A while 9698.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.