PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.01%
Revenue growth under 50% of 9698.HK's 6.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
13.89%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
9.68%
Positive EBIT growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
15.44%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 13.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
1.80%
Positive net income growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.26%
Positive EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.26%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 10.90%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
100.00%
Positive FCF growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-21.23%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-21.23%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-21.23%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
555.17%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 9698.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
555.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
555.17%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
17.31%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
17.31%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
17.31%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.47%
Inventory growth of 80.47% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
7.27%
Similar asset growth to 9698.HK's 7.82%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
0.08%
Positive BV/share change while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
19.69%
Debt growth far above 9698.HK's 8.93%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.54%
We expand SG&A while 9698.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.