0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.75%
Operating income growth under 50% of 9698.HK's 13.51%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1.47%
Positive net income growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.63%
Positive EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
4.63%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.54%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
57.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
59.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1210.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 9698.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1210.34%
Positive OCF/share growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1077.47%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
138.06%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
138.06%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
77.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
42.68%
Inventory growth of 42.68% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
35.24%
Asset growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 7.82%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
10.05%
Positive BV/share change while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
9.48%
Debt growth far above 9698.HK's 8.93%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.