PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
45.70%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
2.76%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 9698.HK's 6.84%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-15.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-16.63%
Negative operating income growth while 9698.HK is at 13.51%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-42.49%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-44.22%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-44.22%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-217.16%
Negative OCF growth while 9698.HK is at 10.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-226.66%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
14.77%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
14.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
16.42%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-867.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-867.61%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-472.61%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-31.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 9698.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-31.54%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 9698.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-48.96%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.78%
Inventory growth of 33.78% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-9.23%
Negative asset growth while 9698.HK invests at 7.82%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.63%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
7.68%
Debt growth far above 9698.HK's 8.93%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.84%
We expand SG&A while 9698.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.